Play chess online, chess clubs, chess teams, free online chess games, chess puzzles, chess games, chess league, online games, free chess online, board games, chess games database and more...

Tags: play chess online, chess, play chess online, chess, play chess online, online chess, online backgammon

Chess Forum
blitzbrain.net << - < - > - >>

From	Message
Posted by andy94 blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 08:02:21 play online chess	Subject: A chess saying... Message: "White plays to win, black plays to draw." I don't remember who said it, but it's an interesting thing to talk about. What do you think?
Posted by ionadowman blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 12:36:32 play online chess	Is it indeed attributable to one person?... Message: I seems to have been the approach taken by many chess masters, but certainly not all. Judging by the recent World Championship match, Vishy Anand had no idea of taking such a line. Bobby Fischer would have thought such an approach pusillanimous. I much prefer the attitude of one Efim Bogoljubov, who flourished in the '20s and '30s: "When I have White, I win because I have the White pieces; when I have Black, I win because I am Bogojubov." Cheers, Ion
Posted by ccmcacollister blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 14:02:17 play online chess	I have always liked Bogo's~! Very masterful :)) Message: Corollaries: Alekhine: "When I am WT I win because I am Alekhine, with black I win because you Are Bogojubov". Mine: "When I am White I win because You are not Bogojubov, with black I win because Bogojubov is deceased and only had an hour to get to the board. " { "Wait a minute, I won? What happened??" } }8-) About drawing with black, winning with WT. Obviously it Wins any single match. Besides that it is often used in RR or double RR play particularly amongst near equals and in long events. In Swiss play, especially short ones, it is not so commonly sought. There it might be more like: Crush the lower rated because you are higher rated; Win with WT among your peers; and Let's see about winning with black among peers and betters since I hope to know my chosen defense better, but if not perhaps I will grace them (aka "bail out" :) with a draw . . .
Posted by kansaspatzer blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 14:04:45 play online chess	Message: I think that such an approach is more applicable at a higher level than most of us are at. Certainly, when you look at the world championship matches such as the one just played between Kramnik and Anand, the notion of who was White and who was Black was critical to match strategy (and it was a very big deal when Anand won as Black.) At my level - I'm around 1600 both on here and OTB, I'm going to play for a win any time I'm playing somebody unless they're much higher rated than I am, in which case I may head for drawish lines, knowing that heading for a technical endgame will likely play into the hands of someone with more endgame experience than myself.
Posted by cascadejames blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 20:39:57 play online chess	Better with Black? Message: For reasons that are unclear to me, I have consistently had a better record on Gameknot with black. So I am skeptical about the application of the rule to those of use who are not Class A players or higher.
Posted by lighttotheright blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 21:35:48 play online chess	Message: I sometimes play for a draw, even when I'm white. I drew a 2300 + player recently doing just that. I was surprised to get an early lead, but I knew it wasn't enough to win. When I got a chance to trade Queens, I took it. I had to give back some material to force a draw, but it worked. I sometimes lose a game because I push things too far - trying to force a win.
Posted by kansaspatzer blitzbrain.net 11/16/2008 22:34:56 play online chess	Message: An attitude I would generally find more profitable would be "keeping the draw in hand" rather than "outright playing for the draw". Trying to push for a miniscule advantage is easier than pushing outright for a draw, in which you aren't able to claim any positional advantages, which can be tricky since playing for a draw tends to be harder than it sounds.
Posted by blake78613 blitzbrain.net 11/17/2008 04:55:41 play online chess	Message: When I am Black, I am happy to repeat a line that lead to a draw, and will keep repeating it until someone finds a way to obtain an advantage. While with White if I draw with a line, I will start looking for a different line.
Posted by ionadowman blitzbrain.net 11/17/2008 12:29:51 play online chess	Back in '83 ... Message: ... I got roped into a six-round Easter tournament, having played just one game (in a telegraph match) in the previous 12 months. Naturally I wasn't in form, having made no preparation. In the event Black won all six of my games! On reflection, I suppose that wasn't such a good occasion to depart from my usual English Opening to try opening lines I hadn't played before. That wasn't very clever... :( Cheers, Ion
Posted by farhadexists blitzbrain.net 11/18/2008 08:07:12 play online chess	Message: At my level (1500-1600), I don't think it matters, as almost every single game is decided by a blunder of some sort, mine or my opponent's. Then again, I've won 60% of my games as White here on GK, and 53% as Black, so maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about. Farhad
Posted by wulebgr blitzbrain.net 11/19/2008 06:16:37 play online chess	another Message: Black is Okay The title of a series of books, and allegedly a famous statement by some player--I don't know who.
Posted by ketchuplover blitzbrain.net 11/19/2008 06:24:03 play online chess	Message: Chess is a theoretical draw-Bobby Fischer
Posted by andy94 blitzbrain.net 11/19/2008 07:28:51 play online chess	Message: Thanks ketchuplover, lack that quote of Bobby!
Posted by fmgaijin blitzbrain.net 11/19/2008 10:50:48 play online chess	Andras Adorjan, wulebgr Message: EOM
Posted by markb56 blitzbrain.net 12/04/2008 11:14:19 play online chess	Message: I have a terrible time playing as White both on GK and OTB. My win record as Black is about 20% higher both on GK and OTB. I prefer playing with a plan (e.g positional) rather than attack. It also depends on the opponent -- young players seem to have a harder time grinding it out than older players, as they need constant stimulus to stay interested.
Posted by ionadowman blitzbrain.net 12/04/2008 11:50:06 play online chess	I guess it depends... Message: ... on what you find "stimulating" enough to keep your interest. Consider that you are down a pawn in a rook ending; possibly - even probably - a draw, but your opponent has whatever the winning chances going. What keeps you interested enough to play the thing down to its last gasp - lose or draw? It could, of course, be your place in a tournament - the possibility of a "grade prize" (if such things are offered), or, since your opponent has 200 ELO rating points more, there's the "moral victory" of acquiring a significant boost to your own rating and an addition to your chess CV. Then, there's the intellectual exercise of making the best of the situation, finding whatever tactics there might be in the position, of setting your opponent problems. The same goes if you're on the upside of such an endgame. Maybe it's worth thinking of it in these terms: When down, you are extracting a draw from a game probably lost; when ahead, you are extracting a win from a game probably drawn! Grinding out the win is not always - I find it's not even usually - lacking in interest. Cheers, Ion
Chess news: Vasily Smyslov, 1921-2010, an Appreciation -- It is not surprising that accolades have poured in from all over the world on the death of Vasily Smyslov, the seventh world chess champion. Though Smyslov was the titleholder for only a year, he was among the world’s best chess players for decades and his games had a certain clarity to them that was widely admired. He did not play speculatively like Mikhail Tal, or adhere to a set of scientific principals, like his great rival, Mikhail Botvinnik. He was not stubbornly dogmatic, like Bobby Fischer, or a technician, like Anatoly Karpov. Though he drew inspiration from Alexander Alekhine, his style was unique. Boris Spassky has often been described as a “universal” chess player because ... A Master of Slow Chess Who’s a Speed Demon, Too -- The best chess players in the world are ranked on their ability to play slow, or classical, chess, in which each side has at least a few hours for a game. None of them are slouches at blitz chess, in which an entire game lasts five minutes or less, but it puts a premium on tactical skill and quick thinking — which is usually the forte of younger chess players. So it is not surprising that Magnus Carlsen, 19, who is the No. 1-ranked player in the world in classical chess, and 22-year-old Hikaru Nakamura, No. 17, look to be the best in the world at blitz chess. Carlsen, a Norwegian, is the reigning world blitz champion, having won the title in November at a tournament in Moscow. Carlsen beat ... Can you keep up with the world's best? -- It can be addictive following the Amber chess tournament - but what should Black do here? Carlsen-Smeets, Amber (Blindfold) 2010. How should Black play? RB Every now and then, when a deadline looms, I go and hole up in an attic for a week or two. With no – or at least fewer – distractions, I can get a lot of writing done. However, the attic does have an internet connection, and one distraction I've been unable to resist is the live coverage of the Melody Amber chess tournament. The rapid and blindfold games are the perfect internet spectator sport – it's great when you can keep pace, even just for a move or two, with the world's elite. I watched Carlsen-Smeets live, but such is my chess memory that ...